DeltaV wrote:Savannah Jay wrote:GumbyDamnit! wrote:
Here's what you guys are heading for... 1. You're not a FB school. Temple thought it was a FB school. Syracuse thought it was a FB school. They sunk millions into chasing the brass ring and their demise is imminent. The best ACC FB schools will get gobbled up. Heck, why stop at 16. Those 2 conference might become (2) 20+ team conferences. UT and OU are just the start. Everyone else is a FB mid major at that point. UConn is not a FB school; they will not survive additional realignment (a year, 2 years, 5 years from now). Just a matter of when...
Agreed, though I'd put forth that 2/3 of the FBS schools are already mid-majors. The powers that be should just go ahead and put the schools that invest heavily in football, have a football driven fan base/culture and generate revenue as a result, into their own division. Regardless of current conference affiliations, the idea that Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan, etc. are playing the same level of football as Duke, UConn, Boston College, Kansas, any school with a directional name, etc., is naive. We already know the pool of schools from which the playoff teams will come from...and it's not a long list.
Every time realignment and the possibility of "super conferences" get mentioned, I wonder if the Vanderbilt board of trustees look at each other and say, "Do you think they remember we're still in the SEC?"
In all seriousness, this would be a great way to set up a euro football style relegation system, just for football.
Take the top however many teams, the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and put them in the champions league. You could probably get two more legit tiers before we really stop caring. Bottom teams drop down, top teams get promoted.
Other than the fact that your average football fan would have a seizure doing anything "euro style", wouldn't that work out? And stop football from screwing up local rivalries in all other sports
butlerguy03 wrote:DeltaV wrote:Savannah Jay wrote:
Agreed, though I'd put forth that 2/3 of the FBS schools are already mid-majors. The powers that be should just go ahead and put the schools that invest heavily in football, have a football driven fan base/culture and generate revenue as a result, into their own division. Regardless of current conference affiliations, the idea that Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan, etc. are playing the same level of football as Duke, UConn, Boston College, Kansas, any school with a directional name, etc., is naive. We already know the pool of schools from which the playoff teams will come from...and it's not a long list.
Every time realignment and the possibility of "super conferences" get mentioned, I wonder if the Vanderbilt board of trustees look at each other and say, "Do you think they remember we're still in the SEC?"
In all seriousness, this would be a great way to set up a euro football style relegation system, just for football.
Take the top however many teams, the Alabama's, Ohio State's, and put them in the champions league. You could probably get two more legit tiers before we really stop caring. Bottom teams drop down, top teams get promoted.
Other than the fact that your average football fan would have a seizure doing anything "euro style", wouldn't that work out? And stop football from screwing up local rivalries in all other sports
Why would you punish the incoming freshmen for what the outgoing seniors didn't accomplish?
Omaha1 wrote:I’m confused why the Big 12 would want UConn. I know the Huskies have an elite basketball pedigree, but they are in a football wasteland.
Jet915 wrote:Not sure where to put this or how accurate this is but looks like the Big East spends more than anyone for hoops.
https://twitter.com/TJAltimore/status/1 ... 7924344835
Xudash wrote:Some additional perspective:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2023/06/14/sec-big-ten-2-billion-athletics-revenue-power-five/70313053007/
In 2022, when money from student fees and forms of institutional and government support is not counted, there was a $62.1 million difference between the median revenue generated by an SEC school and that generated by a Pac-12 school.
For some context, in 2022, only nine public schools outside the Power Five conferences had more than $62.1 million in total operating expenses for their entire athletics program.
In 2022, there were 19 Power Five schools that received at least $10 million in allocated revenue; eight were in the Pac-12.
The emphasis on winning in a financial environment in which profits don’t matter makes it likely that as revenues continue to recover from the pandemic and then start growing again, spending increases will follow.
Read that last excerpt again. Schools like UCONN, Wake, BC and Syracuse, to name a few, don't have a snowball's chance in hell in this rodeo.
Omaha1 wrote:Pretty awesome that San Diego State doesn’t have an offer to join either the PAC12 or Big 12, but asked the MWC for an extra month to see if an offer comes so that when they decide to leave they only have to pay $17 million bucks instead of $34.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests